Thanks Thomas. Someone else sent me a few PDF docs with some interesting research. One of them was by Detroit Diesel giving detailed analysis of the effects of sulphur. I don't have a web link for it. It is about 500kb so I can forward it to an email address if you are interested.
Anyway, on the question of sulphur being a lubricant etc. one of the quotes reads: "Although diesel fuels containing more than 0.5% sulfur are considered high sulfur fuels, piston ring wear studies have shown that the combustion of fuels containing more than 0.3% sulfur significantly increases ring face wear rates. High fuel sulfur forms acids during combustion, particularly during idling and low temperature operation. The best defense against the effects of acid formation is to shorten oil drain intervals."
First, 0.5% and 0.3% sulphur are pretty high percentages (ie. 5000ppm and 3000ppm), so this does not apply to NZ levels (~1000ppm).
Secondly it confirms what the other reply from Huw is saying about oil changes.
One of the other articles focusses on the reduced effectiveness of the different types of cat converters from high sulphur and low grade diesel generally. I don't mind replacing the cat, fuel filter, and even the fuel pump once in a while, but I don't want to have to rebuild the engine all that often
Still, it makes me wonder why all the leading manufacturers have not starting taking their clean diesel consumer engines to NZ already if there is no real problem. Perhaps it is just a matter of warrantees etc. There is an interesting bit of govt research about NZ's policy and strategy at
http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/
default/other_papers/NZConf/06.asp and
http://www.med.govt.nz/ers/oil_pet.html in case anyone is interested.